Shield Up

Tags

privacy, security, upscreen Spy Shield

Available on the market are panels that limit the viewing angle of your laptop, smartphone or other screen, which, of course, would be a very handy physical security/privacy solution if you’re working in an open space. I’ve recently bought an upscreen Spy Shield Clear, which costed just under £40. The vendor also has screens for a very large range of smartphones and laptops, which cost under £10.

One side of the screen is coated with pretty strong adhesive, much stronger than what you get with the average phone screen protector. Of course, it’s tricky to remove and refix if you get air bubbles, but it means it’s not coming off accidentally. I managed to get the screen attached properly after several attempts without damaging the screen or weakening the adhesive.
In the mounting kit, there are alignment stickers for aligning things, a microfibre cloth and alcohol wipe for making sure the surface is totally clean, and a plastic card for smoothing out bubbles as the screen’s applied.

Does the shield work? Yes, if you’re using applications with a dark colour scheme, and if the screen brightness is set very low (as mine always is), and if there’s a lot of ambient light. Basically it’s very effective in an office environment when using something like Visual Studio Code. Effectiveness varies in other cases – if the screen brightness is set to 80% – 100% in lower light conditions, the screen is still visible from even 90%. I noticed the faint lines running through the material also has the effect of making text unreadable outside an angle of about 30 degrees.

Advertisements

Windows 10 Security and Privacy Initial Setup

Tags

AntiVirus, Cortana, privacy, security, Sophos, Telemetry, Windows 10, Windows Defender

Recently I’ve bought my first personal Windows machine, and was a bit wary of connecting it to the Internet without first looking at the security configuration, even though Windows 10 has native memory protection features that make arbitrary code execution pretty damn difficult.
Here I’ll cover the basic steps for enhancing security further, and also a solution that might resolve the privacy issues associated with Cortana and telemetry.

Windows Defender
The first thing I’d recommend is setting up Windows Defender. This provides a basic anti-malware service, links to the local firewall configuration and parental controls. In the Update & Security menu, there’s initially a button to enable the Windows Defender service. Use this to access the Security Centre and its main options.

From what I’ve seen, most consumer-level routers don’t allow for a detailed firewall configuration. This is why it’s a good idea to check the one that’s included with the operating system. Although Windows Defender has a simplified interface for general filtering rules, I prefer to go through the entries in the ‘Windows Firewall with Advanced Security’ application.
The ‘Allow an app through the firewall‘ in the ‘Firewall & network protection‘ tab opens the Control Panel’s Windows Firewall options. Ensure the firewall is enabled for both private and public networks. Clicking ‘Allow an app through the firewall‘ link should open a menu to select and deselect application-level rules.

Application whitelisting, or ‘Default Deny’ – blocking all applications and services except those specifically allowed, is a strategy worth considering for a paranoid-level of security.

SmartScreen settings are displayed under ‘App & browser control‘. Technically SmartScreen improves security by checking the URLs of Edge browser requests against a list of malicious addresses, but it’s a trade-off between that and privacy.

The ‘Family options‘ tab contains options that are potentially useful if children are borrowing the laptop. As with Sophos Home security (which I’ll come to), the ‘Family options‘ are managed through a Web portal so it’s harder to disable without logging into the owner’s account.
Here the owner has the options to determine which sites are accessible in the Edge browser (what happens if Firefox is used?), set time limits for laptop/browsing activity and monitor online activity.

More advanced security-related configurations can be accessed in the classic Control Panel. Options to look at are User Account Control, BitLocker and Storage Spaces.

Disable Telemetry Services
Central to the privacy-related controversy around Windows 10 is the ‘telemetry’ feature. Essentially every several hours the operating system will send limited data about the usage to Microsoft. This cannot be disabled in the user-friendly Privacy settings menu, which instead only allows for Basic or Full diagnostics, but it can be disabled in Services.msc (the Services application), where it’s listed as ‘Connected User Experiences and Telemetry‘.

Some caution is needed when disabling services here, though, as many of them are for inter-process communication between critical operating system components.

Just in case the telemetry feature is re-enabled by some future update, it makes sense to configure the inbound and outbound firewall rules for ‘Connected User Experiences and Telemetry‘ in the Windows Firewall advanced settings. This might also be listed in the simplified firewall menu as ‘DiagTrack‘.

By the way, you could also do this for any applications you want to keep entirely offline.

Third-Party Protection
After the native security features are configured, the next thing to add is a dedicated third-party anti-malware product. I’ve reviewed BitDefender Total Security before, and found it an excellent product definitely worth the £30 annual subscription. I’m also thinking of giving the considerably more expensive F-Secure TOTAL a try, as I believe in supporting a company that takes a principled stand on digital rights, and the Freedome VPN service might prove very useful while travelling.

For now I’ve installed Sophos Home – I’ve followed this vendor’s work for a couple of years as a security undergraduate, and I’m very confident it provides an excellent layer of protection even though it’s a free service. Sign up for an account with Sophos on the site, and download the installer file (roughly 236MB). When launched we get a status screen when running the Sophos Home application.

What we get here is virus protection, Web protection and unwanted application detection. The latter should protect against spyware and adware.

Sophos Home installations are managed from the company’s Web dashboard, which has three configuration sections:

• Virus Protection: Seems like your typical anti-malware detection system.
• Web Category: Determine which categories of sites are allowed and which are blocked.
• Exceptions: Set filtering exceptions for files, Web sites and applications.

An IPv6 Secret Address Generation Algorithm

Tags

client, ipv6, messaging, random, security

How would two clients communicate over IPv6 without a third-party knowing which addresses are used? This is one of the abstract problems I tried to solve back in 2013, when developing the idea of a secure messaging client that makes use of certain features associated with IPv6 (many thanks to Sam Bowne and Chris Tubb for the inspiration). It was based on two assumptions: a) both parties are assigned a block of IPv6 addresses rather than a single address, and b) communicating parties are able to arbitrarily select addresses from within their address ranges.

Address Spaces and Allocations
Given the number of possible IPv6 addresses (2^38 minus a few reserved address ranges), it’s possible that a person would be assigned a sizeable block of addresses from this, such as a 32-bit address space with 4294967296 possible addresses.

I’ve done a bit of research to determine the likely address space a person would typically be assigned. RFC 6177 reccommends allocating /48 blocks to each individual ISP customer. Whether this would actually happen in the real world remains to be seen – it’s also strongly recommended because IPv6 removes the requirement for Network Address Translation, which in turns means that an ideal allocation for a home network would be large enough to make network enumeration a little more time consuming.
IPv6 also allows for stateless address configuration, which should enable clients to select their own addresses, although this depends on how the local router is configured.

The Address Generation Algorithm
My solution is something like:

The session key is secret between two clients – how they share this is another problem which might require out-of-band communication using a public key system. Actually my proposal would be a good candidate for an instant messaging system or social network that works alongside Dark Mail.

The second parameter is the system time, in ‘HHMM’ format, because the algorithm should generate a different IPv6 address every x number of minutes, and HHMM should also be the same for both communicating clients. With a little more coding later, two clients might get this value from a shared source, perhaps over NTP.

Python Implementation
The following imports are required for implementing the concept as a Python script:
* string
* hashlib
* netaddr
* pprint
* time.gmtime and time.strftime

New addresses are generated from a current IPv6 address and a session key that might be shared between peers. These might be read from an application database and/or network interface.


selfAddress = '3ffe:1900:4545:0003:0200:f8ff:fe21:67cf'
selfKey = 'mypassword123'
peerAddress = ' '
peerKey = ' '
currentTime = strftime("%H%M")


In order to get the current address, we require a networking/NIC module that enables us to select the network interface to read from. I’m most of the way through coding a C# version of the client, using System.Net.NetworkInformation to populate a drop-down list of interfaces.

Using the netaddr and pprint modules, an address can be formatted as a hexadecimal string – basically to get the digits without the octet delimiters. The line ‘selfAddressToHex[2:]‘ removes the ‘0x‘ characters from the output.


ip = IPAddress(0, 6)
ip = IPNetwork(selfAddress)
selfAddressToHex = hex(ip.ip)
selfAddressString = selfAddressToHex[2:]


Then a SHA256 fingerprint is generated with [sessionKey+HHMM] as inputs.


hashInput = (selfKey + currentTime)
print('Hash Input: ' + hashInput)
hashedValue = hashlib.sha256(hashInput)
hashedValueString = (hashedValue).hexdigest()
print('SHA256 Fingerprint: ' + hashedValueString)


Now we can substitute the last eight bytes of the current IP address with the last eight bytes of the SHA256 value to generate a new address:


final32 = hashedValueString[56:64]
print('New Suffix: ' + final32)
newAddressString = selfAddressString.replace(selfAddressString[24:32], final32)


Finally, reformat the hex string as a valid IPv6 address by adding the delimiters between octets:


newAddress = ':'.join([newAddressString[i:i+4] for i in range(0, len(newAddressString), 4)])
print('New Address: ' + newAddress)


The running script will produce something like:

We can later write newAddress back to the application database as ‘currentAddress’, and have something that triggers this part of the application every 15 minutes.
There are other things I’d like to build on this, namely components for setting newAddress as the local IP address, and messaging between two clients running the script.

Subgraph OS

Tags

censorship, Investigatory Powers, kernel, linux, Metaproxy, Operating System, os, security, Subgraph, surveillance, tor

As you probably know already, I’m rather zealous in my belief that freedom of expression and privacy are fundamental rights, and they could only be guaranteed with technical safeguards.

Around the same time the Investigatory Powers Act (without opposition from New Labour) granted 40-odd public authorities access to most peoples’ Web browsing histories, Tory politicians took it upon themselves to submit a bill (also unopposed) to ban online pornographic videos that contain anything that wouldn’t be allowed on a commercial DVD. Meanwhile in the United States, The Powers That Be have given themselves a mandate, in the form of what’s referred to as ‘Rule 41‘, to maliciously hack any computer on a Tor circuit.
Given the mainstream media’s campaign against alternative media ‘fake news’ and the associations made between non-mainstream opinion and the ‘far right’, I wonder if tomorrow would see the banning of non-mainstream ideas, and maybe our browsing histories being made available to private sector organisations.

Obviously the solutions must be open source, they must be resilient against adversaries with advanced resources and their designs beyond the control of The Powers That Be. Subgraph OS provides us with an operating system security model needed for the current age, in one installation. As well as being a Linux distribution, I like to think of Subgraph OS as a template or pattern that other Linux installations can be configured to emulate with a little work. This is what I’ve done with my own Linux system over the years.

Application Layer
The first security measure is sandboxing of processes, using Linux namespaces to segregate resource usage. Conventionally a Linux system has a root process, and a single process tree that grows the more programs are running on the system. Linux Namespaces provides a way to logically isolate processes and process trees, so that each uses a separate instance of whatever system resources it needs. Since Linux Namespaces has been a native part of the kernel for a while, anyone could set this up on their own system.

As far as a compromised process is concerned, the root process is the first within the container, and the root privileges won’t extend outside to resources outside the namespace, and neither would the process be able to navigate beyond the virtual root directory – it shouldn’t, for example, be able to spawn a malicious process capable of installing rootkit components in the system directories. The namespace itself might be compromised, but its effects are isolated.

Tor
Based on the older YAZ proxy, Metaproxy creates an independent Tor circuit for each application, and handles the session routing between the applications and Tor proxy.
What protection does this provide? Despite being referred to as an anonymising technology, it only masks the IP addresses of the source and destination servers, and other layers of security are needed to strip payloads of anonymising data.
I should point out there are other options (e.g. VPNs and I2P) to fall back on, for anyone who doesn’t trust Tor.

Kernel Security
Although the containers and namespaces at the application layer are good for isolating compromised processes and containing the damage, ideally the first line of defence is to prevent exploits executing in the first place, at a low level.

PaX provides three low level security measures: Fields are added to the ELF as it’s loaded into memory, so the stack can be made non-executable and the executable section as non-writeable. This effectively prevents the functionality of a running program being extended by malicious code. Address Space Layout Randomisation (ASLR) makes it much harder to an exploit creator to predict memory addresses, assigning a different memory map whenever a process is spawned from an executable file.
Modern operating systems already have similar native components, and existing kernels can be upgraded with versions incorporating the PaX extensions.

Filesystem Encryption
The full disk encryption included with Subgraph is based on the mature and open source dm-crypt. This is an effective defence against threats who gain physical access to the hardware while it’s switched off – for example, if it’s a laptop that’s stolen or mislaid. Often this is provided with mainstream distributions (Linux Mint and openSUSE) as an option during the installation process.
Storage volumes using dm-crypt can also be mounted on Windows systems using LibreCrypt Explorer, by the way, so that potentially allows for some portability.

Payload Anonymisation
One pretty essential layer of security that appears missing from Subgraph is payload/traffic anonymisation, but it should be possible to install Privoxy or Ghostery for this. I strongly recommend this. During the typical browsing session, the payload of browser traffic contains identifying data, and potentially the browser could fetch malicious code from compromised ad servers, even when using Tor.

FreeBSD System Security Overview

Tags

bsdconfig, exploit, FreeBSD, patching, security, update, upgrade, vulnerability

Elsewhere on this blog I’ve probably mentioned that patching, a properrly configured firewall and updated anti-malware protection will prevent 99% of security threats. Fortunately all three can be readily added to a FreeBSD installation, and there are some other native features in this operating system that can provide pretty solid security.
The most important things, in my opinion, are exploit prevention and mitigation – that is, making it hard as possible for something to exploit software vulnerabilities, and restricting what an exploit could do if executed.

BSD Configuration Options
Already present in a FreeBSD installation is the ‘bsdconfig’ utility, which enables low-level configuration changes. The Security and Startup options are the ones we might want to configure, after everything’s set up.

The Securelevel options are used for limiting the actions that could be performed with root privileges, assuming no malicious program is capable of undoing these configuration changes. In Highly secure mode, the loading/unloading of kernel modules, the mounting of additional filesystems and certain configuration changes are disabled. This could provide an additional safeguard against the installation of kenel-mode rootkits. There is a help page describing what each Securelevel option does.

Patching
If an anti-malware system has reacted to a malware infection attempt, it typically means a vulnerability has already been exploited and shellcode was executed. Patching known vulnerabilities and removing software we don’t need really is the first line of defence, if the operating system doesn’t have native exploit prevention measures such as ASLR.
The following commands are used to fetch available updates to the base system, and install whatever has been fetched:
#freebsd-update fetch
#freebsd-update install

This sorts the updates for the core operating system, but there are also a load of other packages that were added later. The following looks for vulnerability notices associated with installed applications:
#pkg audit -F

Vulnerability disclosures are posted quite regularly, so it makes sense to make periodic checks.

To check for packages that could be upgraded to a more recent version:
#pkg version

Another tool we could use for checking for outdated pakages is portmaster.
#portmaster -a

Exploit Mitigation
PolicyKit/PolKit is something I’d need to look into further, but it seems the rough equivalent of SELinux here. Essentially it checks a request to a privileged process from an unpriviliged process, according to specific policies. The idea is that an exploited or compromised program remains limited by whatever policies are set.
A configured PolKit is included as part of the base system, and a GUI for it’s included with KDE by default.

Jails
There is a ‘jail’ utility native to the system, which is based on the chroot concept. Essentially this changes the root directory location for a given process, so that it cannot refer to anything beyond it. The FreeBSD jail adds further mechanisms to restrict access to hardware resources from a process in the chroot, so it almost provides a fake environment with predefined resources. For this to work, the FreeBSD jail requires its own jail name, host name and IP address attributes. A jail could be made to resemble a complete FreeBSD system, or a ‘service’ jail dedicated to one or two processes.
We might use this for compiling a new Linux/UNIX system within a pre-existing host installation, and the FreeBSD handbook makes reference to extracting the contents of an ISO file into the /mnt directory.

Anti-Malware
With UNIX-based systems, the anti-malware solutions have the advantage of performing more thorough checks for anything suspicious in the operating system components.
With FreeBSD’s package repositories, we have a choice of rkhunter, chkrootkit and clamAV. Each has a different method of looking for activity associated with malicious programs, but generally they check for signs of privilege escalation, replaced binaries and processes being hidden from user space.

It might take a little knowledge and experience to understand the command line output from these programs. Of course, the full output of these programs can be dumped to a text file using a command like:
#rkhunter -c >> scanlog.txt

Since all three employ slightly different methods for uncovering rootkits, best results are gained by running all three separately periodically.

Firewall and Packet Filtering
Packet filtering in FreeBSD (and Linux) happens at the kernel level, with the packets passing through the network interface and then the packet filtering module. I think this is more for FreeBSD boxes on the network perimeter, or even to use a FreeBSD box as a firewall, but it’s not a bad idea to have a host-based setup as threats are stopped at the kernel level.

FreeBSD includes three firewalls: PF, IPFW and IPF. IPFW seems the default choice here, as there’s already a ruleset file in /etc/rc.firewall, and it might be easier for most users to simply modify this as needed. There seems to be a disadvantage that IPFW only works with IP addresses, port numbers and transport layers, whereas PF looks at the session layer as well and includes a few other proxying and NAT features.

To enable the IPFW as a service at startup, add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf:

The firewall profiles are listed in rc.firewall. The alternative for a desktop system is ‘client’. For an offline machine it might be ‘closed’. Or we could set this variable to ‘filename’ if we wanted to load all the rules from elsewhere. To list the currently applied firewall rules:
#ipfw list

Then, if any changes were made and the ruleset needs reloading:
#service ipfw restart

inetd
Slightly related to the packet filtering and firewall features, FreeBSD’s repositories include xinetd, which can replace the pre-installed inetd. These programs listen for incoming network traffic, and starts a predefined server process to handle requests for whichever port, while applying any relevant policies. This ensures the right programs respond to incoming requests, and to prevent servers being misused. For example, we might want Apache to handle incoming traffic on ports 80 and 443 only, and to limit the number of session attempts for each IP address.

The rules are defined in /etc/inetd.conf, and the port-service mappings in /etc/services.